There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come.
—Victor Hugo
Yesterday, I had the wonderful opportunity to meet and speak with Education Secretary Jesli A. Lapus. Gigi and Pam of the Philippine Embassy in Vietnam invited me and Michelle to the despedida party of Consul-Gen Baisa and Ms Bel. Sec Lapus was the guest of honor and luckily, Ambassador del Rosario asked me to join them at their table.
We talked about life, family, careers, and of course, CyberEducation! Here are some of the insights I gained from Sec Lapus and from my own research about CyberEd:
What is Cyber Education?
I’m sure you’ve heard of Open and Distance Education (aka Distance Learning). This is a hot topic in our generation because of the availability of fast-paced Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), which includes e-mail, the Internet, multimedia resources, etc.
Distance Learning (DL) is not new.[1] It was invented in 1840 by the Englishman Sir Isaac Pitman when he started giving lessons to his students by mail. What a revolutionary idea! You don’t have to go to a classroom anymore to learn. All you have to do is correspond with your teacher by mail. You don’t have to pay for expensive classroom space! No more costly transportation fees! Distance learning gives every one access to learning, wherever, whenever.
Progressive countries picked up on the idea right away. In the 1900s, DL was established at the University of Chicago. In 1911, the Department of External Studies was created at the University of Queensland, Australia. And in 1969, The Open University was founded (after much objection by conservatives) in the UK[2] with the mission of bringing high quality degree-level learning to people who don’t have the opportunity to attend campus universities.
In the 21st century, Distance Learning is growing at an even faster pace, thanks to e-mail, satellite broadcasts, videos, teleconferencing and, most recently, the Internet. With the arrival of hundreds of online universities, DL is now more commonly known as online learning. The concept is still the same - by using ICT, we can provide quality education to those who don’t have access to it.
So what is CyberEd? Cyber Education Project (CEP) is the name of DepEd’s revolutionary project that will institutionalize Distance Learning in our public school system. By using satellite and computer technologies, public school administrators, teachers and students will have access to video instructions and online resources that are sure to raise the standards of teaching and learning, especially in public schools that are at-risk. What a wonderful idea!
I think, this alone, is reason enough to support CyberEd. But if you’re not yet convinced, then here are 7 more reasons which will make you a supporter of CyberEd:
- CyberEd will level the playing field.
US Education Secretary Horace Mann, the Father of American Education, once said, Education is the great equalizer of the conditions of men. And we all agree! But the problem is, not all education systems are created equal. We all know that private schools are somewhat better than public schools. And urban public schools usually have higher standards than the ones in the rural areas.
The disparities can be lessened by CyberEd. By accessing short instructional videos presented by “master teachers”, public school students and teachers can increase their knowledge in the subject areas of Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies. The “master teachers” will also prepare lesson plans that go with their videos so that public school teachers will be guided in their teaching. They will also have access to shared online resources including worksheets, websites, etc. As a teacher, I know that this kind of support will immediately increase the quality of teaching and learning, for sure!
- CyberEd will assist in teacher-training.
The “master teachers” in the instructional videos don’t have to be teachers. Some of them can be resource presenters. For example, the topic is about lawmaking, the presenter can be a senator. So, the public school teacher and the students learn first-hand from experts. Teachers will improve their subject-matter mastery and this will boost their confidence in teaching. Plus of course, with CyberEd, teachers can have access to online degrees to further their professional development.
Some people have the misconception that as soon as a teacher graduates from teacher-training course, that’s it. This is certainly not the case. Even teachers who have masteral and doctorate degrees will admit to the fact that there’s always a need for continuing professional development. Even wealthy private schools who have highly-qualified teachers, allocate thousands of dollars every year to make sure that there is sufficient on-site and external training for their teachers and administrators.
- CyberEd will help standardize education.
Depending on its implementation, CyberEd can promote consistency in the standards of teaching and assessments in public schools. I can see the potential of having an online portal where teachers from anywhere in the country can access easy-to-use lesson plans and digital resources prepared by experts. We have a national curriculum but its delivery varies from school to school depending on available resources, human and/or financial. By using the same videos, lesson plans, and online resources, there can be more consistency in the delivery of the national curriculum. We are already seeing improvements in our students’ performance in the standardized tests, I’m sure we will see more when we implement CyberEd.
- CyberEd will improve communication.
CyberEd will promote on-line networking among public schools and DepEd offices. Administrators and teachers will have access to email and websites. Memoranda, letters, reminders, and all kinds of messages will be communicated instantly. I don’t think there’s a need to point out the benefits of having direct communication in any organization, and in any relationship for that matter. It’s simply a must!
- CyberEd will lesson our dependence on textbooks.
Back in 2000, Microsoft’s Bill Gates predicted that “Less of the school budgets will be spent on textbooks and more on learning through technology.”[3] Bill Gates’ dream is obviously a textbook publisher’s nightmare. I won’t be surprised to see some of the textbook publishers supporting protests against CyberEd.
Somewhere along the way, we have been conditioned to believe that the only way we can achieve quality education in public schools is by having a student-textbook ratio of 1:1. Every year, the government spends billions of pesos on textbooks. What’s worse is that there may even be some irregularities in textbook procurement, according to Sen Lacson.[4] Maybe it’s time we let go of this system. Maybe it’s time we realize the vast potential of having an online portal that will store teaching materials and resources. A portal that will allow access to teachers so that when they like to use something, they just access it, print it and make enough photocopies for their students. No more textbooks.
In the not-so-distant future, when we really get our act together, we may not even have to print documents because each public school student will have their own laptop. Believe it or not, many schools abroad are now providing a laptop for every student, as early as Grade 1.
- CyberEd will increase Internet access in the country, especially in rural areas.
The December 2000 Report of the Web-Based Education Commission to the President and the Congress of the United States has this to say about the Power of the Internet for Learning: the Internet enables education to occur in places where there is none, extends resources where there are few, expands the learning day, and opens the learning place. It connects people, communities, and resources to support learning. It adds graphics, sound, video, and interaction to give teachers and students multiple paths for understanding. the Web is a medium today’s kids expect to use for expression and communication.
Not surprisingly, the Commission made key recommendations that all point toward the implementation of tech projects with features similar to that of CyberEd’s.[5]
- CyberEd will help the marginalized and the disadvantaged!
Oxfam International says in their campaign, Education is critical to breaking the cycle of poverty… Education is a key to enable poor individuals and marginalized communities to take control of their lives and stand up for their rights. - We all know that this is true. We can argue about the different paths to social development, but we all recognize the central role played by education in helping the poor help themselves get out of poverty.
The tragic death of Mariannet Amper has awakened our senses to the harsh realities of poverty and now, many of us are asking the question, How can we help? Well, here’s one answer - You can help by writing the Education Secretary, your congressman, senators, and the Office of the President and let them know that:
We, the people, support CyberEd!
Your Voice Counts
I read an article in the Inquirer a few days ago saying that the Cyber Education Project is still under review by government panels as its credibility was affected by another Chinese-financed government project, the National Broadband Network(NBN). I think we need to let our voices be heard by our leaders so that they can make the right decision.
I hope you can find time to promote CyberEd. Blog about it, email your friends and write your representatives about this project. It’s a project that will directly assist in providing quality education to the future citizens of our great nation.
===
References:
[1] The Origins of Distance Education and Its Use in the United States. Contributors: Diane Matthews - author. Journal Title: Technological Horizons in Education Journal. Volume: 27. Issue: 2. Publication Year: 1999. Page Number: 54. COPYRIGHT 1999 T.H.E. Journal
[2] http://www.open.ac.uk/about/ou/p3.shtml
[3] School Textbooks Are Doomed but Kids Will Always Need Teachers; GATES PLANS LAPTOPS FOR ALL. Contributors: Richard Garner Education - author. Newspaper Title: The Mirror. Publication Date: February 2, 2000. Page Number: 14. COPYRIGHT 2000
[4] http://www.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2006/1011_lacson1.asp
[5] The Power of the Internet for Learning: Final Report of Web-Based Education Commission. December 2000 (http://www.ed.gov/offices/AC/WBEC/FinalReport/index.html)








28 Responses to “Why We Should Support CyberEd”
Textbooks are such a mess in public schools. I should know because my son studies there. He is in grade 3. In fact, I am fortunate to “choose” among the books being distributed to the school children. After two months of summer in the storage, these books are expectedly full of dust, aside from them already with torn pages, or filled with writings. School children has to make do with what books they get. I know Cyber-Ed will resolve these “textbook” problems, especially here in Mindanao (I live in Davao City). It can also do away with possible future “textbook scams”, and more important textbooks that are found to have a lot of errors in it. Shame on the authors and publishers of these books. I’d like to share my son’s experience also with computer education as a tool. I may be lucky to own a personal computer, and there are times I create my “review lessons” with my son through the computer. Imagine letting a child understand the story of the “Three Little Pigs” by multi-media plus making it interactive. Another thing, when I came across this Cyber-Ed articles, I began to make my own design of the hi-tech arm-chair for use by schoolchildren.
[Reply to this comment]
Some anti-CyberEd groups argue that the CyberEd will only benefit public schools that are capable of acquiring the technology needed by CyberEd. What about those schools that do not even have enough decent classrooms and materials to begin with?
Don’t you think our government should focus their resources more on these “basic” issues rather than going high-tech?
Hi Marcvill! You’re probably right. We should just stick with the status quo and go with what we know – textbooks, chalk and talk, etc. But it has to be said that there’s something noble about the CyberEd proposal. It opens us to the idea that we can spend P20 billion on education. When was the last time a DepEd secretary came up with a giant project like this. Kaya naman pala gumastos e, as we would always say. So whether or not we decide to spend this money on CyberEd or any other DepEd project, the fact remains that we have money to upgrade/improve our public education.
hi lester! i haven’t actually finished reading your post because i’m in a bit of a hurry, but here’s my 2 cents’ so far. i’m pro-education of course, but the means for it to be distributed might also depend on a lot of factors not just the deprived situation of our school system. there are resources to think about, logistical capabilities of our own system, etc.
i like the idea, though. and as roje mentioned, it could be really beneficial for public school students because CEP is not book-dependent. the thing is, what about follow through on the child’s studying, like at home? how will the parents support it? what if we’re talking about families who don’t have personal computers or multimedia equipments? correct me if i’m wrong, but i remember that these aren’t always readily available to a lot of filipinos.
and what about the dependence on technology of kids (leading to a lot of behavioral problems)? might we be risking something here? even if the materials are educational, there’s still such a thing as too much tv (read: marshall mcluhan’s “the medium is the message” theory on communication and society).
i guess DepEd still has a lot more selling to do for this project. But if details are ironed out, i’ll be first in line to support it
i hope you don’t mind my comments!
[Reply to this comment]
01. Conceptually, I see the value of CyberEd. As I firmly believe that EDUCATION is a “Great Equalizer”, I can see the benefits of making use of the Internet as a low-cost alternative to “traditional” Teacher-Student Classroom methodology.
02. On the other hand, DepEd’s CyberEd Project as a “Tied-loan Project” of the Chinese Gov’t needs careful scrutiny - to say the least. I certainly favor a Cyber Educated people - specially the Rural Folks. But I would not rush to spend millions of U$ dollar loans on DepEd’s proposed CyberEd Project lacking full transparency - and highly suggestive of Corruption in High Office.
[Reply to this comment]
Currently on standby mode the CyberEd project has cooled down a bit in the political arena where it first surfaced, dragged into the cesspool of NBN/ZTE. As you probably noted in reading my Education blog, I have learned a number of things on the subject, albeit indirectly acquired via media, to be passionate about it.
That computers have revolutionized many aspects of our life is undeniable. Computerized robots may soon even replace some of our domestic-helper OFWs (ex-teachers). The potential wonders wrought by computers are just starting with the development of nano-transistors that boost processing speed. But their capabilities are not limitless. Artificial intelligence for one is still at the baby blabber stage, no better than trained chimps or talking birds.
One of the scenarios envisioned by the advent of computers and Cyber gimmicks was the beneficial conservation of trees and forests resulting from paperless offices. Half a century has passed and the paperless office is still a myth. CyberEd may equalize the level of playing fields but is helpless in equalizing the learning and assimilation speed of the students in a class.
A weak selling point of the project is the coverage of remote barangay schools. These communities on the fringes consist of very poor families whose primary concern is food, the lowest rung in Maslow’s seven hierarchy of needs. CyberEd would be classified in the 6th or next to the top rung.
The fly in the ointment of the project, the major drawback is its price tag and smeared image. The NBN and CyberEd projects are just two components of the grand design and borrowing binge of this administration, tantalized and enticed by the Chinese government –awash with cash to lend – as geopolitical strategy. The project is silent on how the prevailing shortage of classrooms and furnishing will be addressed.
At this stage, the project would be a hard sell, and unless Secretary Lapus is a wizard endowed with magical powers the project will head the NBN way.
[Reply to this comment]
No offense mate. but people who support CyberEd are people who are never exposed to cyber education. goodness. it’s plain BORING. Try reading the CCNA / CNAP lectures, Microsoft lectures, google lectures. I can’t stand watching their videos because if I do, I’ll sleep myself to death. Even lectures from the OpenSocial people are boring. I mean this lectures are created by top hot Techie guys.
I have no political intentions here. Just stating my horrible experience of a cyber ed…
[Reply to this comment]
I’m with Cheryl. I haven’t experienced an awfully boring class. The only I’m in currently is rather interesting but other’s are horrible. It’s nice to not have textbooks to worry about but reading online materials are the same experience. I support CyberEd as a preference class. I wouldn’t go as far as making it universal way of learning. Only because not all peopl are successful learners that way. If an online class can be sure to be interactive as well as informative I think there’s a success story but the bleak outcome is that majority of the time these cases aren’t so.
[Reply to this comment]
[…] Phil Daily Inquirer article: Nov 24, 2007 - DepEd Modifying CyberEd project […]
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Roje C Garcia! Good to hear that you’ve had positive experiences with technology tools for education. I also believe in the power of this hi-tech distance learning project called CyberEd to directly impact the teaching and learning in our public schools. There are many who are not so happy with the way the project was planned and formulated and they are totally against CyberEd. Perhaps the first version of CyberEd has many loopholes and it should be reviewed more clearly and it’s good that DepEd has opened its doors to multilateral discussions with stakeholders. I’m sure if we put our heads together, we can make CyberEd more practical and effective for our public schools. We need this kind of revolutionary grassroots project!
Hi ris, I appreciate your comments. Like you, I recognize that CyberEd is not a perfect project and that’s probably why it’s still being modified by the government panels and hopefully by the Alliance of Concerned Teachers.
I hear you Ernesto! Thanks to militant groups, DepEd is now modifying the CyberEd Project to make sure it meets the needs and demands of our current public school system. It’s good to see that many Filipinos see technology as a tool for learning. We just need to make sure that the technology is introduced at the right time, right place, right amount and of course, at the right price!
Hi neonate! I hope CyberEd will be a hot topic of discussion again. I don’t mind waiting for long and time-consuming multilateral discussions and debates that will revise/modify/scale-down/upgrade and improve the project. Our country needs to have a massive project like this that takes advantage of the powers of technology to raise the standards of teaching and learning in public schools.
Hi cheryl and shari205! Thanks for sharing. I hope the producers of the educational videos will make sure that their shows are entertaining and educational. To give a simplistic example - I grew up during the Sesame St-Batibot and these two shows are proofs that videos can be both educational and entertaining. Also, the original plan of CyberEd has never been to just have videos in the classroom. The videos are only there to supplement the learning. We’ve all been in a classroom where the teacher would use technology such as overhead projectors, videos, or the Internet to help supplement her teaching. CyberEd uses the same idea. Anyway, I hope the people who are revising CyberEd at the moment can be more transparent and practical in their plans so that the “revised CyberEd†can be more appealing and acceptable to our people.
[Reply to this comment]
Even public school children are not “spared” from computer games. It is a pity seeing them enter a computer shop/i-cafe and spend their day-savings of at least P10 on computer games. It is because they see these computers for use only on computer games. And this goes on from their third grade until their sixth grade. When is the right time then to expose these children that computers are of good use or tool to education? Children in private schools here in Davao City are already using the power of the computer in their education.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Roje G Garcia! Private-school children are definitely getting more exposed to technology than their public school counterparts. I’ve seen what technology can do to assist in the teaching and learning, even in private schools. I hope someday our public schools will also (be ready to) have access to technology.
[…]I believe that the intentions of the project are noble. However, there are other matters that need more attention than this project. […]
[Reply to this comment]
CyberEd is great but Filipinos have more important priorities than that and the country is one of the poorest in the world today. I wish we are as great as the First World countries.
I invite you to visit any public school in the Philippines and see for yourself to say if this program would be practical or practicable at this time.
Nice place to start I suggest would be Commonwealth High School in the National Government Center, National Capital Region.
This school has more than 10,000 student- population, hundreds of teachers and staffs. There were a dozen or more computers.
We parents pay for “computer fee” and added to that, if the program push through at this time, i presume would be “CyberEd fee”.
I had two daughters and a son who graduated in there without even their hands-on at those computers! Rod, rltjs.wordpress.com
[Reply to this comment]
Dear Rod, thanks for inviting me to visit public schools in the Philippines. I don’t consider myself an expert in public schooling but I have some experience in it. I did my practicum teaching at a public high school in Taft Ave Manila and my friends and I founded an NGO that catered to public school students in Libis Elementary School. Anyway, I agree with you that with or without CyberEd, we need to spend more resources in improving our public school system. If our government and the multi-sectoral panel decide that CyberEd is not the answer, I hope that we can come up with something more practical and more effective than it.
I agree that there is a lot of help that we can get from ICT (Information and Communication Technology). However, I see the Cyber and other media devices as tools or support or aides to facilitate or enhance learning. ICT is only one aspect of education which means that CyberEd is not all there to solve the poor quality and the inequality in education especially for young children. Quality education depends more on the teachers, schools, parents and hard work.
As for the Philippines going into Cyber Ed, I think we need to be more specific on what is involved in it. I don\’t believe in CyberEd replacing the traditional classroom teaching particularly for young children. Yes, we can use computers and internet to enhance their learning. In fact, in the school where my children go, they are being taught on how to use computers and how to use the Internet for research. The young children, in particular need a lot of assistance and support from both the classroom teacher and their parents to develop their intellectual, social, physical and spiritual aspects of life. The e-learning is a tool but it cannot provide many other aspects of education.
But for adult, ICT is great. I myself has finished the last year of my PhD through being an external student (distance education). And I have other colleagues, who at the moment are doing their post-graduate degrees through distance learning.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Peacemaker! Nice insights on this issue. We need to spread this attitude of openness to dialogue and change so that major government projects can be implemented well. I couldn’t agree more with you that children definitely need to have an adult to assist and guide them in e-learning. And children need the social interaction at school to give them a holistic education. I don’t think CyberEd plans to replace the teacher. In fact, one of its aims is to improve the competence of teachers. What it might replace is our dependence on textbooks.
I agree with Peacemaker. Cyber Ed replacing the traditional classroom teaching for children is not a good idea for kids most especially at their young ages need a lot of guidance/assistance, nothing compares to teachers personally attending to the “unique” needs of every student.
They haven’t solve yet the problems regarding school building, textbooks, computer and other needs of every government schools in our country, i think before they push through this Cyber Ed, show us a decent school and materials. Like what they’ve said focus first on the basic needs of these children before jumping to another problem.
Another gov’t project might also mean another over priced materials, and an overweight wallet of those corrupt officials. It’s like the ZTE deal which only few people would benefit.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi giean! I think CyberEd is meant to help build a decent school by improving the knowledge of teachers. I read a nice suggestion in SirMartz’s blog that maybe DepEd should have a pilot project first before they try to implement nationwide.
hello po! thank you for visiting my blog. here is my insight about cybered:
http://underside.wordpress.com/2007/10/09/zte-and-depeds-cyber-education/
[Reply to this comment]
Hi nina, thanks for the link.
Good day!
I haven’t dropped by for at least a month. I did not read your whole postsince I am in a hurry. I will read again I promise.
Here’s my thoughts about CyberEd. I think that Cyber Ed is a good idea especially now that many people are willing to learn computer and surf the internet. But I think that CyberEd is not enough to replace the old Educational System.
Another thing is that the project should be transparent so that the people will not think that it is just another ZTE broadband deal. Mahirap pa naman dito sa Pilipineas…maraming pinagkakakitaan ang proyekto ng gobyerno.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Ishmael! Sana nga mas maging transparent ang CyberEd para magtiwala ang mga tao. Malaki pa naman sana ang potensyal nito na makatulong pag-ibayuhin ang edukasyon dito sa ‘ting bansa.
Hi! Im Warren! I read what u post on the internet lester and yes! i will be a supporter of cyberEd because of all the reasons i read in this blog. My story i think will help them to support what u are supporting for. Everytime i listen to teachers with my classmates in the classroom, i cant understand what the teacher is saying. But when my teacher becomes my tutor,he/she discussed to me everything, i understand it already. Come to think of slow learners that they can learn only when they teach everything infront of them. I think of home study but i guess this cyber ed will help me more and i will understand everthing. My teachers also said that there is wrong with the grammars on the book! I support Cyber Ed.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Warren! I used to work part-time as a tutor in my Mom’s tutorial center in Greenhills so I know how effective tutoring can be. Some of us find it really difficult to learn in a big classroom-setting. CyberEd could open up new ways of learning, using multimedia approaches.
[…] I offer my reaction to each of the seven points […]
[Reply to this comment]
that is why i support ur program i think it has to do with what ur supporting
[Reply to this comment]
Thanks for your support, Warren.
Feel free to express your self