If your answer is yes to one or more of the following questions, then this article is for you:
1) Were you affected by the Malu Fernandez controversy?
2) Do you know anyone who is an Overseas Filipino Worker? (OFW)
3) Do you have a relative who is an OFW?
4) Do you believe that many Filipinos are working abroad because of the lack of opportunities here in the Philippines?
5) Do you believe that OFWs help the Philippine economy?
6) Do you believe that the present administration is corrupt and there has to be some changes?
7) Are you an OFW, or an ex-OFW, or are you planning to become an OFW?
If you said yes to any of these, read on…
Perhaps you’ve heard of the controversial memorandum(1) of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA) regarding the Guidelines of the Direct Hiring of Filipino Workers. Please allow me to explain to you why OFWs need your support against this memorandum. We really need your help! Please forward our plea for help to as many people as possible.
By the way, if you prefer to read this in the Filipino language, click here.
Who are the “Direct Hire” OFWs?
There are two ways to get a job overseas. You can either go through an authorized recruitment agency in the Philippines or you can directly contact the employer. Obviously, those who can directly communicate with the foreign employer don’t have to go through a recruitment agency and so the process is referred to as “direct-hire” and they are called “direct-hires.”
OFWs who go through a recruitment agency usually have to pay their recruiter a placement fee and/or a commission. While, those who are direct-hires sometimes take greater risks by staying in a foreign country (sometimes as tourists) and then by God’s grace and through their contacts, they find work. Some direct-hires find work while still in the Philippines when the employer comes to the Philippines to screen applicants.
Both ways of finding work have their own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the jobsite, employer, work, and the contract.(2) There are those who say that it’s important to go through a recruitment agency because they make sure that the employer is a good one. Recruitment agencies also look after you when you’re already in your jobsite. On the other hand, there are others who think that they can do away with recruitment agencies. They think they can deal directly with their employers and they can handle their own problems. And if not, they can always run to the Philippine embassies for help. That’s why they’re there, right?
If you were to choose between the two, which one do you prefer: Go through a recruitment agency or directly deal with the employer?
There is another important thing that we should keep in mind when it comes to the definition of direct-hires. Let’s say an OFW who went through a recruitment agency in their first overseas job finishes their contract with their employer. If he/she decides to find another job overseas with another employer, he/she is now a “direct-hire.”
Before Memorandum No. 4
Let’s say, an employer in the Middle East needs to hire an engineer. A Filipino engineer, who has just finished his contract with another employer, applies for the job. He came highly recommended by his previous employer and so he was accepted in the job. His new employer offered him a salary of $1,000 a month. He was more than happy to take the job, especially because if he can’t find work, he will be forced to go back to the Philippines. They signed the contract and the OFW starts working the next day. Simple, right? That’s direct-hiring!
Enter Memorandum No.4!
Memorandum No.4 (Series of 2007) signed by POEA Administrator Rosalindo Dimapilos-Baldoz took effectivity on January 15, 2008. All employers, whether individuals or companies, must abide by the so-called “guidelines”.
Let’s go back to the story of our Filipino engineer. Now, according to this memorandum, he can’t start working for his new employer. Not yet! First, his employer has to register with POEA. But there’s no need to worry, because the process will not take longer than one month. One month! You mean to say that the Filipino engineer has to wait for a month before he can start working! That’s okay, says POEA. I’m sure his family can wait for a month before he can send money for their food and utilities.
But there’s more to it. There are more requirements that the employer has to submit. Here are the other requirements:
1) The employer must submit the following documents to POEA:
a) copies of their business registration, license, and identification papers
b) sample contracts for the OFW
c) proof that the OFW won’t be charged a placement fee (hello? it’s called “Direct-hire”)
2) Pay a “performance bond” equivalent to the worker’s salary for three months. The performance bond will be used to guarantee compliance of the employer of the contract. So, the performance bond will serve as a penalty fee for the employer in case there’s a breach of contract by the employer. It’s not clear in the memorandum if this performance bond will be given in full to the direct-hire OFW.
In the case of our OFW engineer, his employer has to pay $3000 ($1000 x 3 months) which is approximately P120,000. This sum is to be paid even before the OFW starts work. Wow!
3) Provide a “repatriation bond” in the amount of $5,000 or approximately P200,000. This money is to be used for the direct-hire’s repatriation expenses in case the contract is terminated. Also, in case the OFW dies while overseas, this money is going to be used to bring the remains back to the Philippines.
I thought the government considers OFWs as our modern-day heroes. Then how come they can’t even afford to bring back the remains of OFWs who die while working overseas. I thought this is why OFWs are required to pay their PhilHealth even though they’re not in the Philippines.
4) And the last requirement to get the registration process started is the submission of a Medical Insurance Certificate
Isn’t it common practice that the application for medical insurance gets started as soon as the employee starts working? I think this is also true for companies in the Philippines. And isn’t it true that it takes a while before the insurance company releases the medical insurance certificate. Sometimes, it even takes about three months before the document is released. Wow!
In Other Words
If you were an employer looking for foreign workers, would you really go through the trouble of doing all the above requirements? Would you be willing to set aside $8,000 or approx P320,000 so your Filipino employee can start working for you?
I do admire our government’s high regard for our OFWs. They really believe that employers will jump through hoops to get a Filipino worker.
I really hope that employers will do all these things to get a Filipino worker. But what if they don’t? What if there are so many foreign workers in the global market these days that they can easily get workers from other countries whose governments don’t have ridiculous requirements? What if they decide not to hire Filipino workers? Who is going to be directly affected by this? Who is going to suffer?
Who is going to suffer?
It’s fairly obvious that our OFWs are the ones who will be badly affected by this memorandum and I am one of them. Whether you are an engineer, teacher, domestic helper, nurse, doctor, or any other overseas employee, as long as you hold a Philippine passport and you have a job overseas, you will suffer because of this memorandum. If you don’t lose your job now, you’ll have trouble looking for a job later.
Families who rely on remittances of their OFWs will also be badly hit by this memorandum. How can OFWs send money home if they don’t have a source of income because they have no work? We all know that many OFW’s have mouths to feed and siblings to help send to school.
Another victim of this memorandum will be our economy. OFW’s brought in $15 billion to our economy in 2007.(3) This amount of money is not to be taken lightly. If you think that the call center industry is helping our economy, then multiply it by 5 times and it will match the amount of money brought in by OFWs.
And how will this affect small and big business companies in our country? Well, let’s try to simplify it for everyone. Less employers mean less work for our OFWs. Less work means less OFWs. Less OFWs means less remittance. Less remittance means less “spending power” of Filipinos. Less spending power means less money for other things. People will only have money for their basic needs and commodities. Other businesses will close and there will be less jobs for the millions of Filipinos who are working in the Philippines. So they will start to look for work overseas but they won’t be able to find any. All thanks to Rosalinda Baldoz’s Memorandum Circular No.4.
So who’s going to suffer from this memorandum? You! Me! Every one!
What Should We Do?
If you ask me, the first thing we should demand is the immediate resignation of Rosalinda Dimapilos-Baldoz, the POEA administrator who signed Memorandum Circular No.4. This memorandum is evidence that she doesn’t understand the needs of OFWs and she does not deserve to be at the helm of POEA.
Our second demand should be the immediate revocation of Memorandum Circular No.4. We should all join the mass protest action. It’s clear that we will all suffer because of this new policy on direct-hires. Don’t hesitate to take it to the streets. That’s the only way we can get their attention. Let’s show them that we are serious in demanding for the resignation of Baldoz and the revocation of the memo.
If in case you can’t join the mass protest action, here are other ways you can help this urgent cause:
1) Email your relatives, friends, and every one you know and ask them to join the protest. There’s a link in this page that allows you to email this post to others. There’s also a Filipino version of this post.
2) Text all your contacts and ask them to support our protest.
3) Support the senate inquiry of Sen Manny Villar (4). Email Sen Manny Villar at mb_villar@yahoo.com or go to his website, www.mannyvillar.com.ph
4) Support the congress resolution of Rep Teddy Casino of Bayan Muna party-list (5)
5) Sign the online petition (6)
6) Blog and comment in blogs about Baldoz and her memorandum. When Malu Fernandez spoke badly about the OFWs, we were quick to point out her wrongs and we succeeded. More than ever, our OFWs need your help. Please hear our plea.
My friend, let’s take action! Let’s demand for the resignation of Rosalinda Baldoz and for the revocation of Memorandum No.4!
Click here for the Filipino version of this post.
===
Notes:
(1) POEA Memorandum Circular No.4 - Guidelines on the Direct Hiring of Filipino Workers
(2) Magandang ipalabas ng POEA ang kanilang statistics kung ilang OFW ang dumaan sa recruitment agency at ilan ang direct hire.
(3) Top international economist says Philippine economy has to grow 14% to stop OFW exodus, Positive News Media, Jan 31, 2008
(4) $5K bond hinders Pinoys’ search for better opportunities - Villar seeks Senate inquiry on new direct-hire guidelines
(5) Solon wants memo on OFW hiring scrapped, Feb 3, 2008, GMANews.TV
(6) Online Petition - Abolition of (POEA) Memorandum Circular No. 4






41 Responses to “POEA Memorandum No.4 - Worse Than the Malu Fernandez Controversy”
[...] Do these idiots in DOLE and POEA believe that foreign employers would be rushing to employ Filipinos even with this restrictive policy (MC-4) in place? Don’t they realize that there are millions more people from other countries (w/o these hiring restrictions) who are also vying for overseas jobs? [...]
[Reply to this comment]
[...] MIGRANTE International will start street protests today to press for the scrapping of a controversial rule requiring foreign employers to pay $8,000 in fees to directly hire Filipino workers [...]
[Reply to this comment]
[...] sign the Online petition [...]
[Reply to this comment]
[...] However, the amount of employer bonds for direct hiring is counter-productive and one-sided. I can say this is the result of the employment agencies’ lobby (bribe?) to certain government agencies (conspiracy theory #1) [...]
[Reply to this comment]
this is ridiculous! i understand this is supposed to protect OFWs but it does more harm than good. anything not broken doesn’t need any fixing.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Jojo, thanks for suppporting our cause. Half the battle is won becaue POEA has suspended MC-4’s implementation. I hope the next decision is for its revocation.
MC-4 is meant to “protect” OFW’s, in the same way as lugao vendors give protection money to “kotong boys”.
Thanks,
Lester
[...] In studying the policy and analyzing its impacts to Filipino migrant workers, it can be seen that MC-04 will result to loss of jobs and employment opportunities [...]
[Reply to this comment]
[...] OFW’s are up in arms over the release of Memorandum Circular No. 4 by the POEA which inconveniences employers overseas who want to hire Filipino’s directly without going through an agency. [...]
[Reply to this comment]
[...] I surveyed the comments of the first 2,100 people who signed the appeal to abolish POEA Memorandum Circular No. 4 hosted at iPetition.com. Matindi talaga bumanat ang mga Filipino kapag alam nilang ginugulangan sila. Ang POEA kasi ginagalit mga OFWs e! [...]
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Lester,
I was horrified when the POEA Memo Circular No. 4 was published. I had earlier stated my dismay about POEA arrogance in a comment to the column of former Chief Justice Art Panganiban (Comments welcome at chiefjusticepanganiban@hotmail.com). I stated:
As a former OFW, I had no problems at departure processes nor with the POEA (it did not exist then). The POEA, created to protect the OFWs welfare has instead set up monstrous red tape. Such abominable governance convinces many law abiding citizens that normally want less-government to wish for no-government. odgarcia28@hotmail.com
More OFW articles in his column:
http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20080119-113494/OFWs-unite-A-Test-of-Courage
http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20080112-111983/More-OFW-gripes
http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20080105-110590/Shabby-treatment-of-OFWs-at-airport
[Reply to this comment]
Salamat po sa links. I’m also a fan of PDI’s Inquirer.Net especially since I can’t buy the paper version here in Vietnam.
Best regards,
Lester
OMG no! that’s so troublesome! mahirap na nga maghanap ng trabaho dito sa pilipinas, pati ba naman sa ibang bansa, magiging mahirap din?
[Reply to this comment]
Naku Jamie, sinabi mo! Talagang pahirap ito sa mga OFW. Can you imagine asking your employer that before you can start working for them, they have to give you copies of their business registration and permit and they have to put up an $8000 bond? Grabe no! Some government officials are so out of touch.
are they out of their mind? they keep on saying that the ofw’s are the ” bagong bayani”. now they want you to be their milking cows. they are in a hurry to have more money at your expense. now they want to kill the goose that lays the golden egg with that memorandum # 4.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Ma! Pakibantayan ang mga balita dyan sa Maynila tungkol sa memorandum na ito ha. Pinahinga muna nila at suspendido daw pero baka biglang unti-untiin na naman ang pag-introduce nito. Mukhang desperado na talagang maka-kubra ng pera ng taong-bayan. Palibhasa nabuking yung ZTE deal nila. Ngayon, kaming mga OFW naman ang yayariin.
Love you!
Ley
sabwatan ng poea & recruitment agencies yan of course kikita mga agency tataas kick back ng poea…. isama nyo n rin ang dfa laki din kick back nyan from agencies…. cno mkikinabang sa mga interest ng bond? yan ang totoong nangyayari… ask nyo c tita glo alam nya lahat yan…
This is ridiculous regulation! Having this kind of policy is discouraging foreign employers to help Pinoys to work abroad. Frankly, I feel that this is another way of promoting “graft and corruption” - why? The advance money will eventually be deposited to officials’ accounts! Finally, it is an easiest way to bribe foreign employers!
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Reymos! I share your disgust at the corruption in our government. How many more anomalous contracts and memoranda must we put up with before we say goodbye to this administration? Haay, Diyos ko, tulungan niyo po sana kami.
Salamat,
Lester
POEA has just released a Frequently Asked Questions (Fa-Q POEA) document for the public. The “Fa-Q POEA” document is posted here:
http://www.poea.gov.ph/mc/Q&A%20DirectHiring.pdf
Pinagpipilitan pa rin nilang para sa proteksyon ng mga OFW ang ginawa nilang “guidelines” sa MC-4. Ang kulit talaga! Bakit ba mas marunong pa kayo kaysa sa ‘ming mga OFW? Sino ba ang nagtatrabaho sa ibang bansa? Sino ba ang nagpapakahirap maghanap ng trabaho at ng mga employer. Wala na nga kayong naitutulong sa paghanap namin ng trabaho, ngayon makaka-sagabal pa kayo!
Sasabihin niyo pa sa dokumento na ang “repatriation bond” ay $55 lang ang premium. E paano yung performance bond na three-months salary. Buong ibibigay yon, di ba?
At hindi lang naman yung pera ang pinag-uusapan dito e. Pinag-uusapan dito ay ang abala at hassle na pinapagawa niyo sa aming employer. Bakit ba hindi niyo lang kami hayaang dumiskarte? At kung magkaproblema man kami, e di hihingi kami ng tulong sa embassy. Di ba yon naman ang isa sa mga dahilan kaya may opisina ang pamahalaan natin sa ibang bansa?
Tapos sasabihin niyo pa sa dokumento niyo na 4% lang ang direct-hire noong 2007. So, 96% ng OFWs na lumabas noong 2007 ay dumaan sa recruiter. Tama po yang statistic na yan, pero misleading po. Dahil pag natapos sa kontrata yung mga dating dumaan sa recruiter sa Pilipinas, at makahanap sila ng bagong employer sa ibang bansa, direct-hire na sila.
Gng Baldoz, pakinggan niyo po sana ang tinig namin. Hinihingi po namin ang pag-kansela ng MC-4 at isabay niyo na rin po ang inyong pagbibitiw.
Maraming salamat po.
[Reply to this comment]
I am absolutely horrified by the demented way POEA is trying to help OFWs. Who were they thinking of when they wrote up this policy, because I don’t see how any OFW can benefit from this. I hope the Philippine Embassy here in Hanoi will suspend MC 4 as a show of support to the OFWs in Vietnam.
Filipinos are not indispensable - overseas employers can easily hire other Asian nationalities whose countries will not require the $8,000 bond. And even if you have the bond, can the government guarantee that the contract will not be changed so the OFW will end up paying for the bonds themselves? Pinahaba at pinahirapan niyo lang yung dating procedure, e hindi pa rin naman palang siguradong hindi ipapasa sa Pinoy ang pagbabayad. By the way, who’s going to benefit from the bond interest?
I’m an OFW myself and have been a direct-hire for years. Based from my experience, I can definitely say that this will affect the hiring of Filipino workers- why would foreign employers want to go through all these hassles when they can hire others to do the job, without the headache?
To Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and your appointees (BALDOZ AND BRION): gawin niyo naman ang inyong trabaho! Please do some research and proper consultation before issuing stupid policies like this!
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Love! Buti na lang medyo mabait ang si Ambassador Del Rosario dito sa Vietnam at mukhang nilalakad na ma-exempt tayo. Pero paano naman yung mga bansang maraming mga OFW na hindi raw mga “professionalâ€. Nakakainis talaga. Pati sa ating sariling pamahalaan, may diskrisminasyon. I hope and pray that POEA scraps this memorandum.
Pera pera lang yan. They are not helping our OFWs or anyone. They are only trying to fill their own pockets. Even if that $8,000 (performance and repatriation bond) were to be returned in full to the employee or employer, POEA can temporarily ues the money and invest it and earn more. At 8K per OFW, imagine how much money they can bring in? They can just let that money sleep and they’d be earning millions in interest.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi Dennison, tama ka pare. Pera pera lang talaga yan. Nakakainis, talagang perahan na lang. At parang hindi na uso ang pasakale-pasakale ngayon, garapalan na!
Mis information lang yan. d totoo na 8000 dollars yung babayandan. Ask your local Embassy. 55 dollars lang per contract ang babayadan. dagdag pampagulo lang yan sa Pilipinas para magalit yung mga tao(OFW) sa goverment.
[Reply to this comment]
Dear vince, dagdag pampagulo talaga itong MC-4, lalung-lalo na sa ‘ming mga OFW. Sana totoo yung sinasabi mo tungkol sa $55 pero binasa ko nang husto yung “POEA FAQ” document na naka-post dito:
http://www.poea.gov.ph/mc/Q&A%20DirectHiring.pdf
Ito ang nakasaad sa dokumento nila:
6. Does the employer have to post the repatriation bond and performance bond in cash to the POEA or the POLO?
No. The employer can secure a security bond and pay only the corresponding premium for the US$5000 repatriation bond and the premium for the performance bond. If the bond is issued by a Philippine bonding company, the employer’s cost can be as low as US$55 for a 2-year repatriation bond, depending on the issuing company.
Sa pagkaka-intindi ko sa sagot nila, ang $55 ay para lamang sa repatriation bond. Paano po yung performance bond na 3-month salary? Sana mabigyang-linaw talaga lahat.
At tulad nga po ng nabanggit ko, hindi lang naman po yung pera ang isyu dito, yung isa pa pong isyu ay ang mga hassle na kailangang pagdaanan ng aming mga employer. Sana maunawaan niyo kami at masuportahan.
i am sure this is to protect the big volume of agency hired OFW but there’s a better way to do it. a bond would just discourage the employers to hire filipinos and may opt to other nationals. specially for technicians, cooks, caregivers and other mass hiring requirements.
if the purpose of the bond is to protect the OFW incase something happens, i suggest come-up with an insurance, common fund that they can use. tap a private sector to manage it.
[Reply to this comment]
tama lang na may bond at insurance as long as na.
1. Ma ensure nila na wala nang illegal recuiter.
2. May pamasahe pauwi na mabibigay yung embassy sa pinoy na tumatakas sa employer nila.
3. ma ensure ng Gov. na yung signed contract mo ay yun ang Job mo Abroad.
Anyway OFW din ako.
Im willing to pay as long na makakatulong ako sa mga kababayan ko at syempre saking sarili.
@ pert, Yon nga ang kinasasama ng loob ng ilang mga OFW e. Talagang passing the buck ang ating pamahalaan pagdating sa pangangalaga sa kapakanan ng ating mga kababayang OFW. Sa tingin ko, malaking parte ng pagkakaroon ng embahada sa ibang bansa ang katungkulang pangalagaan at protektahan ang mga kababayan nating naninirahan o nagtatrabaho doon. I hope they own up to their duties and responsibilities to the people they are meant to serve.
@ vince, willing din naman akong magbayad kung pagrerehistro’t pag-sangguni sa ‘ting pamahalaan ang pag-uusapan. Ang akin lang, sana huwag na nilang bigyan ng mga hassle ang mga employer ng mga OFW na Pinoy. Baka kasi sa dami ng requirements, umurong pa sa pagbigay ng trabaho sa ‘tin ang mga ito.
as much as i would like to think that this is more for the benefit of OFWs, im afraid to admit the fact that what dennison said. pera pera lang yon and that they’re only trying to bring in more money (to corrupt, launder, maka-kickback, whatever) for themselves. and yeah i get your point that it’s so much hassle and also discourages potential employers if anything.
so now im wondering, whoever did they consult in drafting this memorandum? im beginning to think this was not well thought out after all. i had different views at first kasi. i really thought mas ok siya dahil it gives the impression na protected and mga OFWs from abusive employers.
but anyway id really like to know what the government has to say about this now that a lot of filipinos are protesting against it.
[Reply to this comment]
Hi iris! Looks like our government is still listening to the voice of the people as they have suspended the implementation of MC-04. I hope they don’t stop there though. I hope they do the right thing and cancel this memo. Thanks, Lester
Kalokohan!
Noong narinig ko sa balita itong bagong Policy na ito ng gobyerna ay naisip ko na ano na namang kalokohan ito?
Problematic ang policy na ito since mahihirapan ang mga Foreign Employers na kumuha ng direct hire Filipino workers at proffesionals. Dahil sa policy na ito ay malamang na hindi na nga kukuha ng empleyadong Pinoy ang mga employers. At dahil diyan ay mapipilitang kumapit sa agency ang mga OFW or umuwi na lang sa Pilipinas (at makipag-agawan sa kakaunting Job opportunities dito sa Pinas). Maaari rin siguro na magpa naturalize na lang sila para hindi na sila tamaan ng Policy na ito.
In any case, I believe that this Policy should be revoked.
Ano naman kaya ang pumasok sa mga utak ng mga taga-POEA?
(Hay naku)
[Reply to this comment]
Hay naku talaga, Ishmael! May hula ako kung ano ang pumasok sa mga utak ng mga taga-POEA… Pera! Sana i-cancel na nila itong memorandum na ‘to. Sa ngayon kasi, irereview daw para tingnan kung sino ang mga exempted. I-eexempt daw ang mga professionals. Grabe no, sa pamahalaan pa natin manggagaling ang diskriminasyon. Ingat, Lester
From Inquirer.Net: POEA suspends memo on employers’ $5,000 repatriation bond (by Veronica Uy)
http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view_article.php?article_id=118871
Good News daw ito! But let’s not be fooled! Huwag po tayong magpaloko. Suspended lang ang memorandum at baka mabago ito sa darating na Lunes. Balak daw nilang dagdagdan ang mga exemptions.
Hindi po exemptions and hinihingi namin, kundi cancellation! We have to continue our protest until they scrap this memorandum.
Mag-ingat po tayo sa kanilang “divide and conquer†tactic. Mr Brion at Mrs Baldoz, style niyo bulok! You already cancelled the memorandum in countries where OFW’s made a lot of noise (Italy, Hong Kong, etc.). Now you are saying that you will review the memorandum to exempt professionals and more countries.
Mr Brion at Mrs Baldoz, mapa-teacher, nurse, doktor, engineer, domestic helper, at kahit ano pang trabaho namin, lahat po kami professionals! Iisa lang ang hinihingi namin! Scrap MC-04!!!
Mga kababayan, magkaisa tayo at huwag tayong magpadala sa kanilang mga “exemptionsâ€.
G Brion at Gng Baldoz, mag-resign na kayo! Wala kayong galang sa ‘ming mga OFW! Lahat kami professional!
Mabuhay ang Samahan Laban sa Katiwalian ng mga Recruitment Agencies at Patakarang MC-04 (SKRAP-MC 4)!
Ituloy po natin ang laban!
Sincerely,
Lester Cavestany
[Reply to this comment]
Madami sa direct hire na documented ng POEA are US bound nurses and IT professionals. Baka di pa nga nurse kasi dati ng may recruitment agency para dyan if not immigrant agad ang visa nila. May isang system na kauumpisa pa lang gamitin ng malalaking company sa US and they do not have enough people with the expertise and experience to work on it. They have to hire a Pinoy or Indian for that (the only english speaking professionals that have the expertise on that system and are willing to get out of their country) with an H1B visa sponsorship. The minimum salary is usd5000 per month. Walang gastos maski piso para maayos yung visa and after 6 months you can already apply for a green card and if you are a Filipino, 6 months lang lalabas na green card mo if H1B original mo na visa. So sa ngayon kung matuloy yang bagong policy na yan usd20000 agad ilalabas ng employer aside from the sponsorship gastos sa US. Sino pa maghahire ng pinoy eh di Indian na lang. And with this policy eh di sinira na agad nila chance ng pinoy na magwork at magkaron ng magandang buhay sa america.
[Reply to this comment]
Sa iba na nga lang talaga sila kukuha. Ang dami na ring ineexport na labor ng mga bansang Pakistan, India, Sri-Lanka, Bangladesh, at iba pang mga bansang katulad natin. Yung ibang bansa pinapadali ng gobyerno nila ang pagkuha nila ng trabaho sa ibang bansa, tayo naman baliktad! Tama na ang paurong! Sulong naman!
Alam niyo ba kung nakapost sa net ang latest na status nito (suspended o cancelled) ? Or is the best way to call the embassy/POLO office ?
By the way, kahit suspended yung 5000 at 3000, may bayad pa din magpa process sa embassy. Sa form na natanggap namin for Canada it is CAD10 + CAD29 na babayaran ng employer.
[Reply to this comment]
As of Feb 14 2008, MC-04 has been suspended. Pagtapos ng balitang sinuspende, nawala na sa balita ang isyu na ito. Sana nga kinansela na lang eh. Please check http://www.poea.gov.ph for updates. I read this document about placement fee policy in Canada.
http://www.poea.gov.ph/mc/memo0298.jpg
Sana nakatulong.
Ingat,
Lester
The Malu Fernandez remains the worst controversy yet, I think. That was the time when some unholy new horors (heroes) wanted to close a publishing house that has a lot of workers and their poor failies not involved directly with the controversy. Its not healthy really for people with KSP to lead a shameful cause and many OFWs followed it with terrible bandwagon effect. Those OFWs never realized that they are reprieved as a matter of fact from heinous crimes they may commit yet try to sentence to death innocent people barely alive struggling to live.
[Reply to this comment]
Ganito ba ang ibabalik na serbisyo ng gobyerno natin sa ating mga OFW? Ilang milyon ang pinapadala natin buwan2x para buhayin ang pilipinas? Tapos ginaganito pa tayo? Kung OFW din sana ang nangangasiwa dyan baka malaman din nila kung ano ang sitwasyon dito sa ibang bansa. Ang gumagawa ng ganyang batas ay mga taong mayayaman at tinitignan lang kung magkano ang makukuha nila at magagatas nila sa ating mga OFW. Yumayaman ang mga politiko at gobyerno pra sa atin. Ang pera natin hindi napupunta sa pamilya natin kundi sa mga gahaman at buwaya na nga gobyerno. Ang bilihin ay kontrolado ng mga intsik at malalaking negosyante na alam natin mga pulitiko din. Ganito nlang ba lagi ang buhay natin? Hindi lang atin kundi pati ating pamilya ang na aapektuhan. Sana mamulat na ang mga OFW at tulungan natin ang isa’t isa hindi pra sa ating mga sarili kundi para din ito sa mga pamilya natin. Kaya nga tayo andito dahil sa kanila, wag nating pabayaan na lamunin at maging parte na rin sila na kababuyan na ginagawa ng gobyerno.
[Reply to this comment]
Excellent article Lester, I am linking this at POGB.
[Reply to this comment]
Thank you POGB. I read your post (http://pedestrianobserver.blogspot.com/2009/02/poea-mc-04-resurrected.html) about this memo’s resurrection. I hope we continue to inform others about the plight of our hardworking “housekeeping professionals” who comprise a big chunk of our nation’s modern-day heroes.
Feel free to express your self